{"id":1342,"date":"2011-05-16T11:32:40","date_gmt":"2011-05-16T18:32:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/balafon.net\/?p=1342"},"modified":"2011-05-16T11:35:07","modified_gmt":"2011-05-16T18:35:07","slug":"linguistic-prescriptivism-as-class-warfare","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/?p=1342","title":{"rendered":"Linguistic Prescriptivism as Class Warfare"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The grammar of a language consists of rules that govern how you arrange the morphemes, words, sentences, paragraphs, etc. that make up your utterances.<\/p>\n<p>That said, why would I be hostile (and I am, if you&#8217;ve ever talked about it with me) to the idea that some utterances are &#8220;better&#8221; or more &#8220;correct&#8221; than others?<\/p>\n<p>The problem is that &#8220;language&#8221; is a fuzzy concept.  Language varies enormously between different communities, social groups, and all the gallimaufrey of human interaction.<\/p>\n<p>Why do people persist in attributing value to one particular variety of language over another?  As a tool of social dominance and status signalling.  As Geoff Pullum notes in his excellent <a href=\"http:\/\/people.ucsc.edu\/~pullum\/MLA2004.pdf\">talk on the subject<\/a>, the written expression of a particular form of English spoken in London a couple hundred years ago has become associated with, not to put too fine a point on it, being successful in business and politics.  Therefore, using this one dialect, which is called Standard Formal English, merely out of a myriad of others in the continuum that is mutually-intelligible English, signals that you are a member of the upper class, that you had the priviledge and leisure in your childhood to become fluent in it.<\/p>\n<p>Note that this post is written in pure SFE.  I don&#8217;t wish to discourage the use of Standard Formal English, as it serves a useful purpose in facilitating communication around the world.<\/p>\n<p>What I do intend to discourage is the notion that using other varieties of English is &#8220;wrong&#8221;, &#8220;bad&#8221; or &#8220;broken&#8221;.  This is as ludicrous as the idea that wearing jeans and t-shirts is &#8220;wrong&#8221;.  There are situations in which wearing jeans would be inappropriate (a funeral), just as there are times when wearing a formal suit would be inappropriate (the beach).  Likewise, there are times when Standard English is appropriate (a job interview), and times when it doesn&#8217;t matter one bit (a text message to a friend).<\/p>\n<p>To think otherwise is, in a nutshell, a morally reprehensible prejudice.  I had a conversation the other day with someone who had believed all their life that &#8220;Low&#8221; German was a &#8220;funny&#8221;, primitive pidgin, thus consigning millions of people to the status of subhumans.  I had some trouble convicing them that the &#8220;Low&#8221; and &#8220;High&#8221; in varieties of German referse to geography, not any qualitative judgement, and that the only reason that the &#8220;High&#8221; variety has the higher prestige is that it happened to be the variety that Luther spoke when he translated the Bible.<\/p>\n<p>I will teach my daughter that Formal Standard English is a useful life skill, but I would never dream of telling her that she is a lesser sort of person if she uses abbreviations in a text message, any more than I would insist that she wear a formal business suit to the beach.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The grammar of a language consists of rules that govern how you arrange the morphemes, words, sentences, paragraphs, etc. that make up your utterances. That said, why would I be hostile (and I am, if you&#8217;ve ever talked about it with me) to the idea that some utterances are &#8220;better&#8221; or more &#8220;correct&#8221; than others? &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/balafon.net\/?p=1342\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Linguistic Prescriptivism as Class Warfare&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1342","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-linguistics","category-rants"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1342","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1342"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1342\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1345,"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1342\/revisions\/1345"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1342"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1342"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1342"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}