{"id":1053,"date":"2009-11-02T21:50:56","date_gmt":"2009-11-03T05:50:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/balafon.net\/?p=1053"},"modified":"2009-11-02T21:50:56","modified_gmt":"2009-11-03T05:50:56","slug":"step-away-from-the-category","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/?p=1053","title":{"rendered":"Step Away from the Category"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I recently stumbled across an <a href=\"http:\/\/principiumunitatis.blogspot.com\/\">interesting blog<\/a> dedicated to the union of the Christian Church, an admirable goal.  But being always on the lookout for sloppy logic, I noticed <a href=\"http:\/\/principiumunitatis.blogspot.com\/2009\/09\/why-protestantism-has-no-visible.html\">one article<\/a> in which the author attempts to show that:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Within Protestantism there is not some one additional entity to which the term \u00e2\u20ac\u0153visible catholic Church\u00e2\u20ac\u009d refers, consisting of these denominations, congregations, believers and their children.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As opposed to the one entity which is the Roman Catholic Church, of course.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, the only thing the author shows is that <b>philosophy students should be forced, at gunpoint if necessary, to take a formal course in logic before they graduate<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p>His argument is as follows:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>This was the error of assuming that unity of type is sufficient for unity of composition. In actuality, things of the same type do not by that very fact compose a unified whole.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>At first glance this might suffice for a Platonist, but consider this: who gets to decide which collections of things of the same type get their own unified whole, and which don&#8217;t?<\/p>\n<p>If the Westminster Confession defines the &#8220;visible catholic Church&#8221; as the unity of Protestant Christians, then who is the author to claim that that entity does not exist, whilst the entity known as the Roman Catholic Church does?<\/p>\n<p>I assume that the author would assert that the doctrines of the Roman Catholic church hold more authority than the Westminster Confession.  <i>But this is not an argument, it is an axiom<\/i>: he has not &#8220;shown&#8221; anything, but simply <i>restated his underlying assumption<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>I can, in fact, refute his argument by construction.<\/p>\n<p>Consider the set <i>C<\/i>, defined as the set of persons adhering to a Christian tradition descended from those developed in the Protestant Reformation.<\/p>\n<p>If mathematics has any access at all to the world of Platonic ideals, then I have just shown that there exists, both in our world and in the ideal world, an entity, <i>C<\/i>, which is identical to the &#8220;visible catholic Church&#8221; as defined in the Westminster Confession.<\/p>\n<p>Quod Erat Demonstrandum<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I recently stumbled across an interesting blog dedicated to the union of the Christian Church, an admirable goal. But being always on the lookout for sloppy logic, I noticed one article in which the author attempts to show that: Within Protestantism there is not some one additional entity to which the term \u00e2\u20ac\u0153visible catholic Church\u00e2\u20ac\u009d &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/balafon.net\/?p=1053\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Step Away from the Category&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[85,141,194],"class_list":["post-1053","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-rants","tag-logic","tag-philosophy","tag-theology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1053","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1053"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1053\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1054,"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1053\/revisions\/1054"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/balafon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}